Back

Hendo "pound for pound greatest" according to Sonnen

Hendo
August 21st 2012

Dan Henderson’s record and achievements do all the talking when it comes to predictions for the UFC 151 fight with Jon Jones, according to Chael Sonnen.

The former middleweight contender, who has now moved up to light-heavyweight, is backing Henderson to take the light-heavyweight title from Jones on September 1. Sonnen is a Team Quest member and considers Henderson a friend and mentor but he insists his choice is based on facts.

“Everyone talks about pound-for-pound champions and pound-for-pound achievements. But if you look at what pound-for-pound should mean - who has the ability to beat small fast guys, the ability to knockout big, strong guys, to move through the divisions with your skill-set and win? - the only conclusion a rational person would make is [that] Dan Henderson is the pound-for-pound greatest of all time,” he says.

“Dan beat the 170lbs champion in Carlos Newton, he’s won the PRIDE 183lbs title, the PRIDE 205lbs title, the Strikeforce 205lbs title, and he’s won the two great tournaments in our sport, the UFC tournament back in the day and the PRIDE Grand Prix.”

“All in all he’s beaten 11 world champions in his career. The man is the best of all time. That is who Jon Jones is facing.”

For his part, Jones has dismissed Henderson as “one-dimensional” because of a perceived reliance on the overhand right to get his wins. He also says it is “strange” to be fighting a man of Henderson’s age, as Henderson’s 41 years contrast sharply with Jones’s status as the youngest champion in UFC history.

Comments

  • chris devine

    Posted at 11:25 on August 22nd 2012

    the only chance hendo has in this fight is a ko. he couldn't even knock out jake shields so there is no way he is knocking out jon jones!!

    Reply to comment

  • ranshenghy

    Posted at 01:25 on December 17th 2012

    John Naughton has an interesting comment on a subject in which I have a professional interest. As a student of contemporary history, I worry about digital archiving.
    At first, researching and writing about the first British government of the internet age was a thrill and a liberation. The Blair premiership was the first to have so many of its primary historical documents on line. Command papers, Hansard, select committee evidence; not sacs hermes boutique to mention huge quantities of contemporary newspaper and BBC reporting.
    So it was a shock to bump into the limit of the information utopia - something that happened quite abruptly on 27 June 2007. The No 10 website was rebuilt overnight, and searches for familiar material brought up an Error 404 File Not Found. Tony Blair had become a digital non-person.
    Of course, the Brown supremacy was not quite engaged in Stalinist obliteration of the past. The entire No 10 website of the preceding years had been copied and stored in a series of snapshots (such as this, above) by The National Archives. It became harder to find things, although The National Archives has worked on improving the search functions since.
    As time passed, it also hermes boutique became harder to find other older documents, as the growing power of Google's algorithms could not quite keep up with the spread of broken links and defunct websites.
    Anyway, Naughton says:
    The longer I've been around, the more concerned I become about long-term data loss 鈥?in the archival sense. What are the chances that the digital record of our current period will still be accessible in 300 years' time? The honest answer is that we don't know. And my guess is that it definitely won't be available unless we take pretty rigorous steps to ensure it. Otherwise it's posterity be damned.
    It's a big mistake to think about this as a technical problem 鈥?to regard it as a matter of bit-rot, digital media and formats. If anything, the technical aspects are the trivial aspects of the problem. The really hard questions are institutional: how can we ensure that there are organisations in place in 300 years that will be capable of taking responsibility for keeping the archive intact, safe and accessible?
    I'm not quite as gloomy as he, sacs hermes having a high opinion of Google's ability to innovate, and of its institutional integrity. But it sac hermes pas cher is undoubtedly an important question.

    Reply to comment

Post your comments...

Please provide all the required fields

Please provide a valid email address